peplexicon
Choose your depth

The essentials in plain language

GLP-1 receptor agonist

Dulaglutide

Published evidence · coverage incomplete

Anatomy in the research

Explore the structures studied.

These are anatomical mentions in cited research—not established treatment targets or proof of benefit in people.

Kidney · 3 cited passage(s)

Population: patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease

In this post hoc analysis, the dual GLP-1 and GIP agonist tirzepatide, compared with the GLP-1 agonist dulaglutide, was associated with a lower incidence of a broad 6-component composite cardiovascular and kidney end point in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.

Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Evidence relationship: supports

Read finding and source →

Population: Population not specified in the source claim.

When compared to dulaglutide and exenatide, semaglutide was associated with a reduced risk for the secondary kidney composite outcome by 8% (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87-0.97])

Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Evidence relationship: supports

Read finding and source →

Population: japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (t2d)

To evaluate and compare the risk of diabetic retinopathy and kidney disease between once-daily liraglutide and once-weekly dulaglutide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Evidence relationship: supports

Read finding and source →
Thyroid · 2 cited passage(s)

A compatible 3D model is not connected yet; the research is available below.

Population: male and female rats

In male and female rats, dulaglutide causes a dose-related and treatment-duration-dependent increase in the incidence of thyroid C-cell tumors (adenomas and carcinomas) after lifetime exposure.

Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Evidence relationship: supports

Read finding and source →

Population: Population not specified in the source claim.

In male and female rats, dulaglutide causes a dose-related and treatment-duration-dependent increase in the incidence of thyroid C-cell tumors (adenomas and carcinomas) after lifetime exposure.

Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Evidence relationship: supports

Read finding and source →

At a glance

What is it—and why does it matter?

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). Dulaglutide increases insulin secretion and decreases glucagon in a glucose-dependent way. The study compared 1-year HbA1c and bodyweight changes using a new-user, active-comparator cohort design with weighted marginal structural models. Common side effects (may affect more than 1 in 10 people) are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.

Sources for this introduction: [1] [2] [3] [4]

This published profile is a reference in progress. Findings retain their source context; missing topics are marked below.

Simple guide

Dulaglutide, in plain English

The main points from the published research. Each one links to the source it comes from.

What it is

What the research looks like

Most published findings come from studies in people.

Who or what was studied, across 129 findings:
  • 77 People 60%
  • 17 Animals or lab 13%
  • 35 Other or unclear 27%

Counts show where findings come from, not how strong they are. Animal and lab findings are counted together because study types have not been labelled for this profile yet.

What studies in people found

What animal and lab studies suggest

Not proven in people. Results in animals or cells often do not hold up in humans.

Safety

How it's used

These describe specific products as labelled or studied. They are not dosing instructions.

What we don't know

This profile does not list specific open questions yet.

A missing finding does not mean something is safe or effective.

Study types are labelled automatically and can be wrong; each finding links to its source.

This is general information, not medical advice.

See all 162 findings and sourcesEvery finding, grouped by topic, with its exact source passages

What is it?

A molecule, not a product name.

Identity

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “New initiation of any GLP-1 RA (liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, or exenatide)”

    Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Obesity Without Diabetes. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide is listed as a protein.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Molecule type: Protein”

    DULAGLUTIDE · Molecule identity

Identity

A Component 1 amino-acid sequence is listed for dulaglutide.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Component 1: HGEGTFTSDVSSYLEEQAAKEFIAWLVKGGGGGGGSGGGGSGGGGSAESKYGPPCPPCPAPEAAGGPSVFLFPPKPKDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSQEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTYRVVSVLTVLHQDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSQEEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSRLTVDKSRWQEGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKSLSLSLG”

    DULAGLUTIDE · Sequence

Identity

Dulaglutide (Trulicity®) is a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist given by subcutaneous injection.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Subcutaneous dulaglutide (Trulicity®) is a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist”

    Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide is included as a GLP-1 receptor agonist in this review.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Primary research examining the association between GLP-1 RAs (i.e., dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, semaglutide, tirzepatide) and suicidality were included for analysis.”

    Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Suicidality: A Systematic Review. · METHODS

Identity

Dulaglutide (DU) is a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide (DU) is a once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).”

    Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review of the dulaglutide clinical data focusing on the AWARD phase 3 clinical trial program. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide (Trulicity™) is a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist that was recently approved.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) class is rapidly expanding, with dulaglutide (Trulicity™) as a once-weekly agent recently approved.”

    Dulaglutide: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. · INTRODUCTION

Identity

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Once-weekly treatment with dulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, may have efficacy with regard to glycemic control in youths with type 2 diabetes.”

    Once-Weekly Dulaglutide for the Treatment of Youths with Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide is a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “As the half-life is short, both short-acting, exendin-4 (Ex4) and long-acting, liraglutide and dulaglutide, GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have been developed”

    The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, Ex4, reduces intromission in sexually experienced male mice. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist.”

    Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide was one of the GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs studied.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “GLP-1 receptor agonists dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide.”

    Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. · EXPOSURE

Identity

Trulicity contains dulaglutide.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Trulicity contains the active substance dulaglutide.”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · Overview

Identity

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 analog fused to an IgG4 Fc moiety.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “We selected dulaglutide, a GLP-1 analog fused to an IgG4 Fc moiety, as a model Fc-fusion protein.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide is made of 2 modified GLP-1 analogues designed to be long-acting and once-weekly.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide consists of 2 GLP-1 analogues that have been modified to make it a long-acting, once-weekly agent.”

    Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes. · DATA SYNTHESIS

Identity

Dulaglutide-DNP has a cyclic DNP peptide fused to the C-terminus of each Fc chain.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “We produced dulaglutide-DNP, featuring a cyclic DNP peptide fused to the C-terminus of each Fc chain, in Chinese hamster ovary cells.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide was one of the GLP-1 receptor agonists used in this study.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Among 8869 matched sets of GLP-1RA (76.6% semaglutide, 15.2% dulaglutide, 7.9% liraglutide, and 0.3% exenatide)”

    Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Oral Agents for Insulin Discontinuation in Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation. · RESULTS

Identity

Dulaglutide (LY2189265) is a GLP-1(7-37) analogue linked to a modified immunoglobulin G.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide (LY2189265) is a GLP-1(7-37) analogue fused by a linker to a modified immunoglobulin G.”

    Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide (Ligand ID: 7638) is a peptide; its INN is dulaglutide.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Name: dulaglutide Ligand ID: 7638 Type: Peptide INN: dulaglutide”

    dulaglutide · Identity and approval

Identity

Dulaglutide (Trulicity™) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist given by once-weekly subcutaneous injection and produced using recombinant DNA technology.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide (Trulicity™) is a once-weekly subcutaneously administered glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist produced by recombinant DNA technology”

    Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Identity

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA).

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), dulaglutide, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).”

    Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes. · OBJECTIVE

How does it work?

Target, response, and disposition.

Mechanism

Researchers tested dulaglutide’s direct effects on force of contraction via GLP-1R using paced (1 Hz) isolated human right atrial muscle preparations.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “We tested the hypothesis that dulaglutide directly increased force of contraction in the human heart via GLP-1R. To this end, we conducted contraction experiments in paced (1 Hz) isolated human right atrial muscle preparations (HAP).”

    Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. · Abstract

Mechanism

Using medication dates, the study counted glucose-lowering drugs before vs on/after starting therapy and labeled each patient as lower, no change, or higher count; this included people starting dulaglutide.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Using medication-specific dates, substances were classified as baseline (before index) or subsequently recorded (on or after index), and within-patient change as a lower count, no change, or a higher count.”

    Changes in recorded background glucose-lowering therapy after initiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes. · METHODS

Mechanism

Dulaglutide was analysed as a GLP-1 receptor agonist using FAERS data from 2021Q1 through 2026Q1.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from 2021Q1 through 2026Q1 were processed using deleted-case exclusion, latest-case-version retention, and case-product deduplication with analysis at the GLP-1 primary-suspect case-product level. Primary-suspect records for semaglutide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, and lixisenatide were analysed”

    Postmarketing Safety Signals and Medication-Use Risks of GLP-1-Based Therapies in Diabetes and Obesity: A Multi-Source Pharmacovigilance and Regulatory Evidence-Mapping Study. · MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mechanism

Dulaglutide promotes satiety.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “and promoting satiety.”

    Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes. · DATA SYNTHESIS

Mechanism

Dulaglutide activates GLP-1 receptors to increase glucose-dependent insulin release, decreases glucagon, and slows gastric emptying.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide activates the GLP-1 receptor, a membrane-bound cell-surface receptor coupled to adenylyl cyclase in pancreatic beta cells. Dulaglutide increases intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) in beta cells leading to glucose-dependent insulin release. Dulaglutide also decreases glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 12.1 Mechanism of Action

Mechanism

Dulaglutide increases insulin secretion and decreases glucagon in a glucose-dependent way.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “by stimulating insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon in a glucose-dependent manner”

    Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes. · DATA SYNTHESIS

Mechanism

DNP peptide is a cyclic peptide reported to help transport across small-intestinal epithelial cells.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “DNP peptide, a previously identified cyclic peptide that facilitates transport across small-intestinal epithelial cells.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Mechanism

Dulaglutide is a synthetic peptide that mimics GLP-1 at the GLP-1 receptor.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “This synthetic peptide mimics the action of GLP-1 at the GLP-1 receptor.”

    IUPHAR ligand commentary · Mechanism of action

Mechanism

This study evaluated changes in recorded background glucose-lowering drug counts after starting a GLP-1 receptor agonist; dulaglutide was one of the drugs started.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “To evaluate changes in recorded background glucose-lowering active-substance counts after initiation of a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist.”

    Changes in recorded background glucose-lowering therapy after initiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes. · AIMS

Mechanism

Dulaglutide mimics GLP-1 at the GLP-1 receptor.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “This synthetic peptide mimics the action of GLP-1 at the GLP-1 receptor.”

    IUPHAR ligand commentary · Mechanism of action

Mechanism

The study aimed to estimate the total value of dulaglutide (and semaglutide) by using composite NNTs to calculate cost per event avoided in people with established cardiovascular disease.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “This research aims to overcome this limitation by developing multiple composite NNTs to derive the CPEA to estimate a total value of semaglutide and dulaglutide in people with established cardiovascular disease.”

    Calculating cost per event avoided using a composite number needed to treat. · OBJECTIVE

Mechanism

Dulaglutide increases how much insulin the pancreas releases in response to food.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “by increasing the amount of insulin that the pancreas releases in response to food.”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · How does Trulicity work?

Mechanism

At 100 nM in isolated human atrial muscle, dulaglutide increased phosphorylation of phospholamban (serine 16) and the inhibitory subunit of troponin.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide (100 nM) augmented the phosphorylation state of phospholamban at serine 16 and the phosphorylation state of the inhibitory subunit of troponin.”

    Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. · Abstract

Mechanism

Fc-fusion proteins can have extended half-lives through FcRn-mediated recycling.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Fragment crystallizable (Fc)-fusion proteins represent a major class of biologics with extended half-lives via neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated recycling.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Mechanism

The analysis searched for diabetic retinopathy using MedDRA Lower-Level Terms.

Molecular / pharmacology evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “'Diabetic retinopathy' was the key search term mapped to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Lower-Level Terms (LLTs).”

    Association between glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a disproportionality analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system data. · METHODS

Mechanism

Dulaglutide-DNP kept its structure and FcRn-binding affinity similar to unmodified dulaglutide.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide-DNP retained structural integrity and FcRn-binding affinity comparable to those of unmodified dulaglutide.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Pharmacokinetics

In healthy subjects after a single dulaglutide dose, geometric mean Cmax was 29.4 ng/mL (0.5 mg), 44.2 ng/mL (0.75 mg), and 81.5 ng/mL (1.5 mg).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Following a single-dose administration of 0.5 mg, 0.75 mg, or 1.5 mg dulaglutide in healthy subjects, geometric mean maximum concentrations (Cmax) were 29.4, 44.2, and 81.5 ng/mL, respectively.”

    Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Dulaglutide After Single or Multiple Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects and Patients with T2DM: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study. · RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics

Dulaglutide’s elimination half-life is about 5 days.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The elimination half-life of dulaglutide was approximately 5 days.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 12.3 Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

In both populations, geometric mean half-life was 4-5 days and median tmax was approximately 48 h.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Geometric mean for half-life of 4-5 days and median time to Cmax(tmax) of approximately 48 h were observed in both study populations.”

    Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Dulaglutide After Single or Multiple Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects and Patients with T2DM: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study. · RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics

After intraintestinal dosing in mice, dulaglutide-DNP reached the portal vein within 10 min and was later detectable in systemic circulation.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Following intraintestinal administration, pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that dulaglutide-DNP rapidly entered the portal vein within 10 min and could be subsequently detected in the systemic circulation.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Pharmacokinetics

Drug exposure increased dose-proportionally after both single and multiple dosing.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dose-proportional increases in drug exposure were observed after both single and multiple dosing.”

    Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Dulaglutide After Single or Multiple Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects and Patients with T2DM: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study. · RESULTS

What has been studied?

What the evidence says.

Comparative evidence

At 1 year, atrial fibrillation risk was slightly higher with tirzepatide than dulaglutide (HR: 1.04, [1.00-1.07]).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Tirzepatide showed slightly higher 1-year atrial fibrillation risk (HR: 1.04, [1.00-1.07]).”

    Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Analysis. · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

At week 40, weight decreased more with tirzepatide than with dulaglutide: estimated treatment difference -6.9 kg (CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg; P< 0.001).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Change from baseline in weight at week 40 was -10.5 kg (SE, 0.5) with tirzepatide and -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) with dulaglutide (estimated treatment difference, -6.9 kg [CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg;P< 0.001]).”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

In RCTs in type 2 diabetes, dulaglutide alone was noninferior to once-daily injected liraglutide for improving glycemic control at 26 weeks.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In randomized controlled trials in patients with T2DM, dulaglutide monotherapy was noninferior to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide monotherapy and significantly more effective than oral metformin monotherapy in improving glycemic control at 26 weeks.”

    Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Comparative evidence

This was a two-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “This two-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled study”

    Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Dulaglutide After Single or Multiple Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects and Patients with T2DM: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

After matching, there were 24 305 people in the dulaglutide group and 24 305 in the tirzepatide group.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “One-to-one greedy nearest-neighbor matching (caliper 0.1) on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory/echocardiographic data produced balanced cohorts of 24 305 patients each.”

    Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Analysis. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

The study compared dulaglutide with dapagliflozin and DPP-4 inhibitors.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “This is an unblinded real-world study using propensity score analysis of consecutive patients with T2DM and MASLD received either SGLT-2i (dapagliflozin; n = 21), GLP-1RA (dulaglutide; n = 21), or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i; n = 20).”

    Effects of dapagliflozin and dulaglutide on blood pressure and coronary flow in liver steatosis patients with type 2 diabetes. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

Adding a GLP-1RA did not increase the chance of stopping insulin compared with SGLT-2i or DPP-4i.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Among veterans with T2D receiving basal insulin therapy, addition of GLP-1RA did not increase the chances of stopping insulin therapy compared with SGLT-2i or DPP-4i therapy.”

    Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Oral Agents for Insulin Discontinuation in Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation. · CONCLUSION

Comparative evidence

Death risk was lower with semaglutide than with dulaglutide (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.93]).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was also associated with reduced risk of death (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70-0.93]).”

    Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

In RCTs in type 2 diabetes, dulaglutide alone improved glycemic control more than oral metformin at 26 weeks.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In randomized controlled trials in patients with T2DM, dulaglutide monotherapy was noninferior to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide monotherapy and significantly more effective than oral metformin monotherapy in improving glycemic control at 26 weeks.”

    Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Comparative evidence

This study compared tirzepatide starters with dulaglutide starters who had HFpEF, tracking outcomes over 1 year and 3 years.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study used de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (as of December 2025). Adults ≥ 18 years with HFpEF (ICD-10: I50.3) initiating tirzepatide (n = 35 174) or dulaglutide (n = 52 999), without prior exposure to the comparator, were identified. One-to-one greedy nearest-neighbor matching (caliper 0.1) on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory/echocardiographic data produced balanced cohorts of 24 305 patients each. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated 1-year and 3-year risks of all-cause mortality, acute heart failure events, all-cause hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, MACE, MAKE, acute pancreatitis, and hypoglycemia.”

    Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Analysis. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

SURPASS-CVOT compared tirzepatide with dulaglutide for cardiovascular protection in people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Central to this review is the analysis of the SURPASS-CVOT trial, which compared the cardiovascular protective effects of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic CV disease.”

    GIP in Cardiovascular and Kidney Disease: From Physiology to Pharmacology. · MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comparative evidence

The study compared semaglutide vs dulaglutide on 1-year changes in HbA1c and bodyweight.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Co-primary outcomes were 1-year changes in HbA1c and bodyweight, estimated using a new-user, active-comparator cohort design with marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weighting.”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

The study compared people who started liraglutide, dulaglutide, or exenatide between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “we performed both a 3-way comparison of patients initiating liraglutide, dulaglutide, or exenatide from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

At 36 weeks, dulaglutide 4.5 mg led to more weight loss than 1.5 mg.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide 4.5 mg was superior to 1.5 mg for weight loss at 36 weeks for both estimands (treatment regimen: -4.6 vs. -3.0 kg, ETD -1.6 kg,P< 0.001; efficacy: -4.7 vs. -3.1 kg, ETD -1.6 kg,P< 0.001).”

    Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11). · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

In this post hoc analysis, tirzepatide had a lower rate of the 6-part heart-and-kidney composite outcome than dulaglutide in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In this post hoc analysis, the dual GLP-1 and GIP agonist tirzepatide, compared with the GLP-1 agonist dulaglutide, was associated with a lower incidence of a broad 6-component composite cardiovascular and kidney end point in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.”

    Cardiorenal Outcomes With Tirzepatide Compared With Dulaglutide in Patients With Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURPASS-CVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. · CONCLUSIONS

Comparative evidence

Semaglutide had a lower risk of the secondary kidney composite outcome than dulaglutide (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87-0.97]).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “When compared to dulaglutide and exenatide, semaglutide was associated with a reduced risk for the secondary kidney composite outcome by 8% (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87-0.97])”

    Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

Over 1 year, tirzepatide users had lower risks than dulaglutide users for several outcomes (including death and hospitalization) in the matched HFpEF cohorts.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Tirzepatide linked to lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.59-0.74]), all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.82-0.88]), stroke (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: [0.87-0.97]), MACE (HR: 0.89, 95% [CI: 0.84-0.93]), MAKE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.79-0.91]), and acute pancreatitis (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: [0.63-0.96]).”

    Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Analysis. · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

At week 40, HbA1c decreased more with tirzepatide than with dulaglutide: estimated treatment difference -0.77% (95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%; P< 0.001).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Change from baseline in HbA1cat week 40 was -1.44% (SE, 0.07) with tirzepatide, 15 mg or MTD, and -0.67% (SE, 0.08) with dulaglutide, 4.5 mg or MTD (estimated treatment difference, -0.77% [95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%;P< 0.001]).”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

The study compared people who started semaglutide with people who started dulaglutide between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “and a 2-way comparison of patients initiating semaglutide or dulaglutide between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021.”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

A phase 4 randomized open-label trial compared increasing dulaglutide dose versus switching to tirzepatide in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “To compare efficacy and safety of escalation of dulaglutide dose versus switching to tirzepatide in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · OBJECTIVE

Comparative evidence

At 36 weeks, dulaglutide 3.0 mg lowered HbA1c more than 1.5 mg under the efficacy estimand, but not under the treatment-regimen estimand.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide 3.0 mg was superior to 1.5 mg for reducing HbA1c, using the efficacy estimand (ETD -0.17% [-1.9 mmol/mol];P= 0.003) but not the treatment-regimen estimand (ETD -0.10% [-1.1 mmol/mol];P= 0.096).”

    Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11). · RESULTS

Comparative evidence

HbA1c fell more at 1 year with semaglutide than with dulaglutide (ETD -0.22 percentage points; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.15).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Semaglutide new users (n = 1901) achieved greater 1-year reductions than dulaglutide new users (n = 2735) in HbA1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0.22 percentage points [95% CI -0.30, -0.15])”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · FINDINGS

Comparative evidence

The study compared retinopathy and kidney-disease risk between once-daily liraglutide and once-weekly dulaglutide in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “To evaluate and compare the risk of diabetic retinopathy and kidney disease between once-daily liraglutide and once-weekly dulaglutide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D).”

    Comparison between liraglutide and dulaglutide on the incidence or progression of eye and kidney complications. · AIMS

Comparative evidence

The study compared 1-year HbA1c and bodyweight changes using a new-user, active-comparator cohort design with weighted marginal structural models.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Co-primary outcomes were 1-year changes in HbA1c and bodyweight, estimated using a new-user, active-comparator cohort design with marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weighting.”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · METHODS

Comparative evidence

The comparison group had no recorded GLP-1 RA exposure.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “the comparator cohort included patients without recorded GLP-1 RA exposure (n= 142,047 before matching).”

    Clinical Outcomes Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Exposure in Non-Diabetic Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. · Abstract

Comparative evidence

In healthy male Chinese subjects, HEC14028 and dulaglutide (Trulicity®) were pharmacokinetically equivalent by Cmax and AUC0–∞ criteria.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The study results showed that HEC14028 and dulaglutide were pharmacokinetically equivalent: 90% confidence interval (CI) of C max and AUC 0–∞ geometric mean ratios were 102.9%–122.0% and 97.1%–116.9%, respectively, which were both within the range of 80.00%–125.00%.”

    A pharmacokinetic study comparing the biosimilar <scp>HEC14028</scp> and Dulaglutide (Trulicity®) in healthy Chinese subjects · Abstract

Comparative evidence

In AWARD-6, dulaglutide 1.5 mg was non-inferior to liraglutide.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was non-inferior to liraglutide in AWARD-6.”

    Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review of the dulaglutide clinical data focusing on the AWARD phase 3 clinical trial program. · Abstract

Study findings

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was linked to lower 24-hour systolic blood pressure and higher 24-hour heart rate.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was associated with a reduction in 24-hour SBP and an increase in 24-hour heart rate.”

    Effects of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Dulaglutide on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus · Abstract

Study findings

In REWIND, MACE was defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack, or nonfatal stroke.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “MACE; primary composite outcome comprising CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke”

    Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Study findings

In a patient with PWS, dulaglutide caused weight loss.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In case 2, dulaglutide induced weight loss”

    PERSPECTIVE: Beyond the GH-IGF-1 axis: a network perspective integrating clinical observations and mechanistic insights. · RESULTS

Study findings

In adults over 50 with type 2 diabetes in a Taiwan real-world cohort, dulaglutide use was linked with lower risk of unspecified dementia.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Among GLP-1 RAs, both liraglutide (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, P=0.0091) and dulaglutide (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.92, P=0.0311) showed significant protective effects against unspecified dementia.”

    Risk of Dementia after initiation of GLP-1 RA versus long-acting insulin in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus. · RESULTS

Study findings

In REWIND, TRULICITY reduced the risk of first MACE event vs placebo (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79, 0.99).

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “TRULICITY significantly reduced the risk of first occurrence of primary composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke (HR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.79, 0.99).”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 14.5 Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease or Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Study findings

Over 1 year, semaglutide starters had a larger HbA1c drop than dulaglutide starters (ETD -0.22 percentage points; 95% CI -0.30, -0.15).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Semaglutide new users (n = 1901) achieved greater 1-year reductions than dulaglutide new users (n = 2735) in HbA1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0.22 percentage points [95% CI -0.30, -0.15])”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · FINDINGS

Study findings

In SUSTAIN-7 non-eligible people, semaglutide starters had a larger 1-year HbA1c drop than dulaglutide starters (ETD -0.23 percentage points; 95% CI -0.31, -0.15).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “not meeting SUSTAIN-7 trial-eligibility (HbA1c: ETD -0.23 percentage points [95% CI -0.31, -0.15]”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · FINDINGS

Study findings

The primary outcome did not differ across GLP-1 receptor agonists, including dulaglutide.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “No differences were observed among different GLP-1 receptor agonists for the primary outcome”

    Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. · CONCLUSIONS

Study findings

In this study, semaglutide vs dulaglutide showed no difference in risk of DME treatment (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.69-1.14).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “the hazards for treatment of DME or PDR (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.11), DME (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.69-1.14)”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · RESULTS

Study findings

At week 40, HbA1c changed by -0.67% (SE, 0.08) from baseline with dulaglutide 4.5 mg or MTD.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Change from baseline in HbA1cat week 40 was -1.44% (SE, 0.07) with tirzepatide, 15 mg or MTD, and -0.67% (SE, 0.08) with dulaglutide, 4.5 mg or MTD (estimated treatment difference, -0.77% [95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%;P< 0.001]).”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · RESULTS

Study findings

In real-world studies, 23.4-55.7% of dulaglutide-treated patients reached HbA1c under 7.0%.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “23.4-55.7% of patients achieved HbA1c < 7.0%.”

    Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. · RESULTS

Study findings

In two human cohorts (n = 109), GLP-1 receptor agonist use was linked to lower BMI and higher vitamin D, with no change in EDSS or relapse rate.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In humans, GLP-1RA use was associated with BMI reduction and vitamin D augmentation without change in EDSS or relapse rate (two cohorts; n = 109).”

    GLP-1 receptor agonists in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. · RESULTS

Study findings

After 24 weeks, CV increased in the insulin group from 39.85 ± 4.99% to 43.26 ± 5.75% (p<0.001).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “the CV (from 39.85 ± 4.99% to 43.26 ± 5.75%; p<0.001)”

    Dulaglutide vs insulin in adolescents with thalassaemia-induced diabetes: effect on metabolism and atherogenesis (DIADEMA). · RESULTS

Study findings

In real-world studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, dulaglutide lowered HbA1c from baseline by 0.5-2.2% over 3-24 months.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide reduced HbA1c from baseline to 3-24 months by 0.5-2.2% across studies (n = 20)”

    Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. · RESULTS

Study findings

In real-world studies, dulaglutide was linked with 2.1-6.4 kg weight loss over 3-12 months.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Weight was reduced by 2.1-6.4 kg across studies of 3-12 months (n = 15).”

    Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. · RESULTS

Study findings

At week 40, weight changed by -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) from baseline with dulaglutide.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Change from baseline in weight at week 40 was -10.5 kg (SE, 0.5) with tirzepatide and -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) with dulaglutide (estimated treatment difference, -6.9 kg [CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg;P< 0.001]).”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · RESULTS

Study findings

The key secondary endpoint was weight change from baseline at week 40.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The key secondary end point was change from baseline in weight at week 40.”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · MEASUREMENTS

Study findings

After 12 weeks, cDI increased by 0.5 (181.0%) in the dulaglutide arm.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The 12-week increases in the macupatide, dulaglutide and combination arms were, respectively: cDI, 0.2 (63.2% change), 0.5 (181.0%) and 1.0 (321.5%);”

    Insulin Sensitivity and Beta Cell Function With Macupatide Alone or With Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 1b, Randomised Controlled Trial. · RESULTS

Study findings

Dulaglutide 0.75 mg was noninferior to placebo for 24-hour heart rate: 1.6 bpm (95% CI 0.3, 2.9; P ≤0.02).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide 0.75 mg was noninferior to placebo (1.6 bpm; [0.3, 2.9]; P ≤0.02) for 24-hour heart rate (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]), but dulaglutide 1.5 mg was not (2.8 bpm [1.5, 4.2]).”

    Effects of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Dulaglutide on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus · Abstract

Study findings

In SUSTAIN-7 non-eligible people, semaglutide starters lost more weight over 1 year than dulaglutide starters (ETD -2.01 kg; 95% CI -3.07, -0.95).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “bodyweight: ETD -2.01 kg [95% CI -3.07, -0.95]”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · FINDINGS

Study findings

In spontaneously beating mouse right atrial tissue, dulaglutide did not increase beating rate.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “and did not increase the beating rate of spontaneously beating mouse right atrial preparations.”

    Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. · Abstract

Study findings

At 26 weeks, HbA1c rose by 0.6 percentage points with placebo and fell by -0.6 (dulaglutide 0.75 mg) and -0.9 (dulaglutide 1.5 mg); P < 0.001 vs placebo for both.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “At 26 weeks, the mean glycated hemoglobin level had increased in the placebo group (0.6 percentage points) and had decreased in the dulaglutide groups (-0.6 percentage points in the 0.75-mg group and -0.9 percentage points in the 1.5-mg group, P < 0.001 for both comparisons vs. placebo).”

    Once-Weekly Dulaglutide for the Treatment of Youths with Type 2 Diabetes. · Abstract

Study findings

Over 1 year, semaglutide starters lost more weight than dulaglutide starters (ETD -1.92 kg; 95% CI -2.91, -0.93).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “and bodyweight (ETD -1.92 kg [95% CI -2.91, -0.93])”

    Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. · FINDINGS

Study findings

In EAE animal models, GLP-1 receptor agonists consistently reduced clinical severity, with mechanisms including AMPK/SIRT1 activation, NLRP3 suppression, Th1/Th17 modulation, and microglial deactivation.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “GLP-1RAs consistently reduced clinical severity in EAE models through multiple mechanisms (AMPK/SIRT1 activation, NLRP3 suppression, Th1/Th17 modulation, microglial deactivation).”

    GLP-1 receptor agonists in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. · RESULTS

Study findings

In this study, semaglutide vs dulaglutide showed no difference in risk of PDR treatment (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.45-1.09).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “and PDR (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.45-1.09) all found no difference between drugs.”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · RESULTS

Study findings

In ten real-world studies, 27.2-61.0% of patients on dulaglutide were adherent.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Based on outcomes from ten studies, 27.2-61.0% of dulaglutide patients were adherent.”

    Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. · RESULTS

Study findings

The primary outcome was average body-weight change from baseline after GLP1RA-based therapy in ESRD.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Primary outcome was mean reduction in body weight from baseline following treatment with GLP1RA-BT.”

    Safety and Efficacy of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonism-Based Therapies in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. · METHODS

Study findings

The review included 29 studies (11 articles and 18 abstracts).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “A total of 29 studies (11 articles; 18 abstracts) were included.”

    Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. · RESULTS

Study findings

The abstract concludes dulaglutide is effective for T2DM and has acceptable tolerability and safety.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In conclusion, dulaglutide is an effective treatment for T2DM and has an acceptable tolerability and safety profile.”

    Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review of the dulaglutide clinical data focusing on the AWARD phase 3 clinical trial program. · Abstract

Study findings

In mice, IV dulaglutide-DNP lowered blood glucose about as well as unmodified dulaglutide.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In mice, intravenous dulaglutide-DNP lowered blood glucose levels as effectively as unmodified dulaglutide, suggesting that DNP peptide fusion did not impair the intrinsic pharmacological activity of dulaglutide.”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Study findings

A higher recorded background glucose-lowering drug count was most common with dulaglutide (52.9%).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “A lower count occurred in 17.2% of patients, no change in 38.8%, and a higher count in 44.0%, most frequently with dulaglutide (52.9%) and least with tirzepatide (20.4%).”

    Changes in recorded background glucose-lowering therapy after initiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes. · RESULTS

Study findings

In paced isolated human atrial muscle, dulaglutide increased contractile force in a concentration- and time-dependent way.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “We detected a concentration- and time-dependent positive inotropic effect of dulaglutide in HAP.”

    Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. · Abstract

Study findings

The study found no difference in risk of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy after starting different GLP-1 RAs, including dulaglutide, in adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “we identified no difference in the risk of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy after initiation of different GLP-1 RA agents among adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk.”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · CONCLUSIONS

Study findings

In this study, people starting dulaglutide had no difference in risk of treatment for DME or PDR compared with people starting exenatide (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.73-1.12).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “When comparing patients who initiated treatment with exenatide (n = 14 076, median follow-up 969 days; interquartile range [IQR] 578-1444) to those starting dulaglutide (n = 54 787, median follow-up 948 days; IQR 551-1457) or liraglutide (n = 25 562, median follow-up 1007 days; IQR 575-1494), no differences were found in the hazard (hazard ratio [HR]) of composite treatment for DME or PDR: exenatide versus dulaglutide (HR 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.12)”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · RESULTS

Study findings

The primary endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 16.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The primary end point was change from baseline to week 16 in mean 24-hour SBP, a tree gatekeeping strategy compared the effects of dulaglutide to placebo.”

    Effects of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Dulaglutide on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus · Abstract

Study findings

The primary kidney outcome combined incident CKD stages 3-4 and kidney failure (including CKD stage 5 and kidney replacement therapy).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “A primary kidney composite outcome inclusive of incident diagnosis codes for CKD stages 3-4 and kidney failure (inclusive of CKD stage 5 and kidney replacement therapy).”

    Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. · OUTCOME

Study findings

In a patient with PWS, dulaglutide reduced insulin needs.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “and reduced insulin requirements in a patient with PWS”

    PERSPECTIVE: Beyond the GH-IGF-1 axis: a network perspective integrating clinical observations and mechanistic insights. · RESULTS

Study findings

Average persistence on dulaglutide was 146-152 days at 6 months and over 250 days at 12 months.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Mean persistence was 146-152 days and > 250 days in 6- and 12-month studies, respectively.”

    Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. · RESULTS

Study findings

The secondary kidney outcome added death from any cause to the primary kidney composite outcome.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “A secondary kidney composite outcome included the elements of the primary composite outcome plus death from any cause.”

    Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. · OUTCOME

Study findings

In 154 children from 10 years of age with type 2 diabetes, after 26 weeks HbA1c fell by 0.7 percentage points on Trulicity and rose by 0.6 percentage points on placebo.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “After 26 weeks of treatment, patients on Trulicity had a reduction in HbA1c levels of 0.7 percentage points, versus an increase of 0.6 percentage points for patients on placebo.”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · What benefits of Trulicity have been shown in studies?

Study findings

Over a median of 46.9 months, 27.4% (1803) of people on dulaglutide had the primary cardiorenal end point.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “After a median (IQR) treatment duration of 46.9 (34.6-50.6) months, the primary cardiorenal end point occurred in 1559 tirzepatide-treated patients (23.7%) and 1803 dulaglutide-treated patients (27.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90; P < .001).”

    Cardiorenal Outcomes With Tirzepatide Compared With Dulaglutide in Patients With Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURPASS-CVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. · RESULTS

Study findings

In five of six AWARD Phase 3 studies, dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly beat the active comparator and more patients reached HbA1c targets (<7.0% and ≤6.5%).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “At the primary endpoint, in five of the six studies, once weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg was superior to the active comparator [exenatide, insulin glargine (two studies), metformin, and sitagliptin], with a greater proportion of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets of <7.0% (53.0 mmol/mol) and ≤6.5% (47.5 mmol/mol).”

    Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review of the dulaglutide clinical data focusing on the AWARD phase 3 clinical trial program. · Abstract

Study findings

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was not noninferior to placebo for 24-hour heart rate: 2.8 bpm (95% CI 1.5, 4.2).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Dulaglutide 0.75 mg was noninferior to placebo (1.6 bpm; [0.3, 2.9]; P ≤0.02) for 24-hour heart rate (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]), but dulaglutide 1.5 mg was not (2.8 bpm [1.5, 4.2]).”

    Effects of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Dulaglutide on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus · Abstract

Study findings

In mice, intraintestinal dulaglutide-DNP reduced blood glucose to 39.0 % of baseline.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · Study independence not established

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated that intraintestinal dulaglutide-DNP administration significantly reduced blood glucose levels to 39.0 % of the baseline,”

    Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. · Abstract

Study findings

In this study, semaglutide vs dulaglutide showed no difference in risk of treatment for DME or PDR (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.11).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Likewise, when comparing patients initiating semaglutide (n = 30 911, median follow-up 625 days [IQR: 455-850]) versus dulaglutide (n = 32 844, median follow-up 639 days [IQR: 459-878]), the hazards for treatment of DME or PDR (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.11)”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · RESULTS

Study findings

People starting dulaglutide had no difference in risk of treatment for DME or PDR compared with those starting liraglutide (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.79-1.19).

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “When comparing patients who initiated treatment with exenatide (n = 14 076, median follow-up 969 days; interquartile range [IQR] 578-1444) to those starting dulaglutide (n = 54 787, median follow-up 948 days; IQR 551-1457) or liraglutide (n = 25 562, median follow-up 1007 days; IQR 575-1494), no differences were found in the hazard (hazard ratio [HR]) of composite treatment for DME or PDR: exenatide versus dulaglutide (HR 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.12), liraglutide versus dulaglutide (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.79-1.19)”

    Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. · RESULTS

Study findings

The primary endpoint was HbA1c change from baseline at week 40.

Human research · design must be checked

1 cited source · 1 linked study ID

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1cat week 40.”

    Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. · MEASUREMENTS

Studied populations

Trulicity is used in adults and children from 10 years of age with type 2 diabetes.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Trulicity is a medicine used in adults and children from 10 years of age with type 2 diabetes.”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · Overview

Risks and interactions

Risks, organized for scanning.

Contraindications

TRULICITY should not be used in people with a personal or family history of MTC or with MEN 2.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “TRULICITY is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of MTC and in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · WARNING: RISK OF THYROID C-CELL TUMORS

Contraindications

Do not use TRULICITY if you have a personal or family history of MTC or if you have MEN 2.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “TRULICITY is contraindicated in patients with:Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2)”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS

Contraindications

Trulicity can be used alone when metformin is inappropriate due to intolerance or contraindications.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “as monotherapy when metformin is considered inappropriate due to intolerance or contraindications”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · Therapeutic indication

Interactions

TRULICITY can delay stomach emptying and may slow how fast some oral medicines are absorbed.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “TRULICITY delays gastric emptying and thus has the potential to reduce the rate of absorption of concomitantly administered oral medications.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 7.1 Oral Medications

Safety findings

In rats, dulaglutide increased thyroid C-cell tumors after lifetime exposure, and the increase depended on dose and treatment duration.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In male and female rats, dulaglutide causes a dose-related and treatment-duration-dependent increase in the incidence of thyroid C-cell tumors (adenomas and carcinomas) after lifetime exposure.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · WARNING: RISK OF THYROID C-CELL TUMORS

Safety findings

In rats, dulaglutide increased thyroid C-cell tumors after lifetime exposure, and the increase depended on dose and treatment duration.

Animal / laboratory evidence

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

Animal or laboratory findings do not establish benefit or safety in people.

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “In male and female rats, dulaglutide causes a dose-related and treatment-duration-dependent increase in the incidence of thyroid C-cell tumors (adenomas and carcinomas) after lifetime exposure.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · WARNING: RISK OF THYROID C-CELL TUMORS

Safety findings

Common side effects (may affect more than 1 in 10 people) are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The most common side effects with Trulicity (which may affect more than 1 in 10 people) are nausea (feeling sick), vomiting and diarrhoea.”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · What are the risks associated with Trulicity?

Products and regulatory status

Same ingredient. Different records.

Regulatory status

TRULICITY is indicated to improve glycemic control, along with diet and exercise, in adults and children age 10 years and older with type 2 diabetes.

Regulatory record

2 cited sources · 2 regulatory records

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

2 cited passages across 2 source records.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults and pediatric patients 10 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE

  2. supports · Source-backed record
    “TRULICITY®is indicated:As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults and pediatric patients 10 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Regulatory status

TRULICITY is indicated to lower the risk of major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes who have cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors.

Regulatory record

2 cited sources · 2 regulatory records

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

2 cited passages across 2 source records.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “To reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE

  2. supports · Source-backed record
    “To reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Administration context

The practical clinical context.

Administration

Trulicity comes as prefilled pens for injection under the skin in the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “It is available as prefilled pens containing a solution to be injected under the skin in the abdomen (belly), in the thigh or in the upper arm.”

    Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) · How is Trulicity used?

Dose records

The maximum recommended dose of TRULICITY is 4.5 mg under the skin once weekly.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The maximum recommended dosage is 4.5 mg injected subcutaneously once weekly.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 2.1 Adult Dosage

Dose records

The recommended starting dose of TRULICITY is 0.75 mg under the skin once weekly.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “The recommended starting dosage of TRULICITY is 0.75 mg injected subcutaneously once weekly.”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 2.1 Adult Dosage

Dose records

TRULICITY single-dose pens come as 0.75 mg/0.5 mL, 1.5 mg/0.5 mL, 3 mg/0.5 mL, and 4.5 mg/0.5 mL.

Regulatory record

1 cited source · 1 regulatory record

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record.

Evidence boundary: Applies only to the source-defined population, formulation, dose, and assessment period.

Exact passages, locators, and provenance
  1. supports · Source-backed record
    “Injection: TRULICITY is a clear and colorless solution available as:0.75 mg/0.5 mL solution in a single-dose pen1.5 mg/0.5 mL solution in a single-dose pen3 mg/0.5 mL solution in a single-dose pen4.5 mg/0.5 mL solution in a single-dose pen”

    These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 · 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

Additional research & classification gaps

33 archived statements are kept separate from drug-effect findings. Media studies, economic models, methods, and records with unresolved scope are not used as medical-effect evidence.

Inspect contextual research (33)
Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

By 3 years, death risk was lower with tirzepatide than with dulaglutide (HR: 0.60, [0.55-0.65]).

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

The main PK endpoints for comparing HEC14028 with dulaglutide were Cmax and AUC0–∞.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

For dulaglutide, CPEA was lower when the composite endpoint included more outcomes ($1,884,013 → $1,670,366 → $607,886).

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

The conclusion was that dulaglutide and liraglutide had similar risks for retinopathy, albuminuria, and reduced GFR.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide showed greater A1C reduction than placebo, metformin, insulin glargine, sitagliptin, and twice-daily exenatide.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

The study reported no difference between tirzepatide and dulaglutide for heart attack or hypoglycemia.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

For dulaglutide, the NNT was lower when the composite endpoint included more outcomes (72 → 64 → 23).

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

There are no direct head-to-head trials comparing tirzepatide and dulaglutide in HFpEF.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide has been shown to improve β-cell function.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

In SURPASS-CVOT, tirzepatide was non-inferior to dulaglutide for 3-point MACE.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Using REWIND-based calculations, dulaglutide CPEA was $1,884,013 (MACE-3), $1,670,366 (MACE-5), and $607,886 (CKM).

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Main outcomes were new or worsening retinopathy or kidney disease, including albuminuria or eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide has been shown to improve glycemic control more than placebo.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

In Croatia, semaglutide was most used/costly among GLP-1 receptor agonists; dulaglutide was next, then liraglutide.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Glycemic control and bodyweight improvements were maintained with long-term treatment up to 2 years.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide promotes weight loss when used as first-, second-, or third-line therapy.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Using REWIND data, the NNT for dulaglutide was 72 (MACE-3), 64 (MACE-5), and 23 (CKM).

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide changed A1C by -0.78% to -1.51%.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide lowers A1c, fasting glucose, and after-meal (postprandial) glucose.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide had a PRR of 9.01 (95% CI: 7.11-11.42) for diabetic retinopathy in FAERS.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Over 3 years, 16.7% of GLP-1RA starters stopped insulin; the risk ratio was 0.93 vs SGLT-2i and 0.98 vs DPP-4i.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide reduces A1C and weight.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide is also called LY-2189265.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

  • DULAGLUTIDE
    Dulaglutida; Dulaglutide; Dulaglutide component of trulicity; LY-2189265; LY2189265; Trulicity
Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide is also called Trulicity.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

  • DULAGLUTIDE
    Dulaglutida; Dulaglutide; Dulaglutide component of trulicity; LY-2189265; LY2189265; Trulicity
Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide is also listed as “Dulaglutide component of trulicity.”

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

  • DULAGLUTIDE
    Dulaglutida; Dulaglutide; Dulaglutide component of trulicity; LY-2189265; LY2189265; Trulicity
Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

The preferred name is DULAGLUTIDE.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide’s ChEMBL ID is CHEMBL2108027.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide is also called Dulaglutida.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

  • DULAGLUTIDE
    Dulaglutida; Dulaglutide; Dulaglutide component of trulicity; LY-2189265; LY2189265; Trulicity
Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide is a GLP-1 mimetic.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

Dulaglutide is also called LY2189265.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

  • DULAGLUTIDE
    Dulaglutida; Dulaglutide; Dulaglutide component of trulicity; LY-2189265; LY2189265; Trulicity
Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

For dulaglutide, CPEA was computed as NNT × median follow-up duration × estimated net price.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

The study analysed dulaglutide FAERS reports using reporting odds ratios, proportional reporting ratios, and an approximate Information Component.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research context · scope unclassified

1 cited source · Study independence not established

How to read this evidence

Sources and study IDs describe provenance, not clinical strength. Several articles can report the same study; one study can support several distinct findings. No clinical strength rating has been assigned here.

1 cited passage across 1 source record. 1 publication group(s) lack a resolved study identity.

The study adjusted baseline differences between the liraglutide and dulaglutide groups using propensity score weighting.

Research context only—not evidence of a treatment effect.

Research status + gaps

What still needs better answers?

  • Some extracted findings are not shown because they did not pass Peplexicon's automated evidence checks.

These are the limits of this profile, not an exhaustive list of scientific uncertainties.

References + discovery

Open the records yourself.

  1. DULAGLUTIDE ↗

    chembl-molecule · published August 26, 2026 · retrieved August 26, 2026

  2. These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 ↗

    dailymed · published June 16, 2026 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  3. These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TRULICITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for TRULICITY.TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous useInitial U.S. Approval: 2014 ↗

    dailymed · published December 9, 2023 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  4. Once-Weekly Dulaglutide for the Treatment of Youths with Type 2 Diabetes. ↗

    doi · published June 4, 2022 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  5. A pharmacokinetic study comparing the biosimilar <scp>HEC14028</scp> and Dulaglutide (Trulicity®) in healthy Chinese subjects ↗

    doi · published April 1, 2024 · retrieved September 8, 2026

  6. Effects of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Dulaglutide on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ↗

    doi · published October 1, 2014 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  7. Trulicity | European Medicines Agency (EMA) ↗

    ema · published September 4, 2026 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  8. IUPHAR ligand commentary ↗

    iuphar-comments · published August 26, 2026 · retrieved August 26, 2026

  9. dulaglutide ↗

    iuphar-ligand · published August 26, 2026 · retrieved August 26, 2026

  10. Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published March 1, 2015 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  11. Dulaglutide: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published January 1, 2015 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  12. Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published December 1, 2015 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  13. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review of the dulaglutide clinical data focusing on the AWARD phase 3 clinical trial program. ↗

    pubmed · published November 1, 2016 · retrieved September 8, 2026

  14. Dulaglutide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published February 1, 2020 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  15. Real-World Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. ↗

    pubmed · published July 1, 2020 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  16. Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11). ↗

    pubmed · published March 1, 2021 · retrieved September 8, 2026

  17. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Dulaglutide After Single or Multiple Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects and Patients with T2DM: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study. ↗

    pubmed · published January 1, 2022 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  18. Association between glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a disproportionality analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system data. ↗

    pubmed · published March 1, 2025 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  19. Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial. ↗

    pubmed · published May 1, 2025 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  20. Risk of Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, and Exenatide. ↗

    pubmed · published February 1, 2026 · retrieved September 4, 2026

  21. Calculating cost per event avoided using a composite number needed to treat. ↗

    pubmed · published December 1, 2026 · retrieved August 26, 2026

  22. Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Suicidality: A Systematic Review. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved August 21, 2026

  23. Cardiorenal Outcomes With Tirzepatide Compared With Dulaglutide in Patients With Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURPASS-CVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. ↗

    pubmed · published June 1, 2026 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  24. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Obesity Without Diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved August 21, 2026

  25. Small intestine-permeable cyclic peptide-mediated enhancement of Fc-fusion protein absorption in mice. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved September 11, 2026

  26. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, Ex4, reduces intromission in sexually experienced male mice. ↗

    pubmed · published July 1, 2026 · retrieved August 28, 2026

  27. Effects of dapagliflozin and dulaglutide on blood pressure and coronary flow in liver steatosis patients with type 2 diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published July 1, 2026 · retrieved September 11, 2026

  28. GIP in Cardiovascular and Kidney Disease: From Physiology to Pharmacology. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved September 3, 2026

  29. Insulin Sensitivity and Beta Cell Function With Macupatide Alone or With Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 1b, Randomised Controlled Trial. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved September 11, 2026

  30. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Once-Weekly Injectable Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Managed in UK Primary Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved August 20, 2026

  31. Comparison of Specific Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Kidney Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published September 1, 2026 · retrieved September 5, 2026

  32. PERSPECTIVE: Beyond the GH-IGF-1 axis: a network perspective integrating clinical observations and mechanistic insights. ↗

    pubmed · published July 1, 2026 · retrieved August 27, 2026

  33. Contractile effects of dulaglutide in the human atrium. ↗

    pubmed · published July 1, 2026 · retrieved September 11, 2026

  34. Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Oral Agents for Insulin Discontinuation in Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved August 19, 2026

  35. GLP-1 receptor agonists in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. ↗

    pubmed · published September 1, 2026 · retrieved August 17, 2026

  36. Comparison between liraglutide and dulaglutide on the incidence or progression of eye and kidney complications. ↗

    pubmed · published July 25, 2026 · retrieved September 9, 2026

  37. Safety and Efficacy of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonism-Based Therapies in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ↗

    pubmed · published August 4, 2026 · retrieved August 21, 2026

  38. Trends in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist utilization and expenditure in Croatia. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved August 19, 2026

  39. Risk of Dementia after initiation of GLP-1 RA versus long-acting insulin in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus. ↗

    pubmed · published August 8, 2026 · retrieved August 21, 2026

  40. Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Analysis. ↗

    pubmed · published August 1, 2026 · retrieved September 3, 2026

  41. Changes in recorded background glucose-lowering therapy after initiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes. ↗

    pubmed · published September 1, 2026 · retrieved August 31, 2026

  42. Dulaglutide vs insulin in adolescents with thalassaemia-induced diabetes: effect on metabolism and atherogenesis (DIADEMA). ↗

    pubmed · published August 19, 2026 · retrieved September 3, 2026

  43. Clinical Outcomes Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Exposure in Non-Diabetic Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ↗

    pubmed · published August 20, 2026 · retrieved August 29, 2026

  44. Postmarketing Safety Signals and Medication-Use Risks of GLP-1-Based Therapies in Diabetes and Obesity: A Multi-Source Pharmacovigilance and Regulatory Evidence-Mapping Study. ↗

    pubmed · published September 3, 2026 · retrieved September 5, 2026

Publication history and provenance

Version 18 · Automated assessment · September 12, 2026

cfcb9eb2cc01b69b7ada844d78585cfcaca10a62af44089bb2b1e8ea8bb997be